Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2020, Page: 50-58
Transforming Learning Through User-Centered Design Research Methods
Jon Spruce, Manchester School of Art, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
Martyn Evans, Manchester School of Art, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
Received: Jun. 26, 2020;       Accepted: Jul. 8, 2020;       Published: Aug. 5, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajad.20200502.15      View  192      Downloads  112
This paper considers how design educators can harness the evolving nature of design practice to enhance learning for design students. It sets out the reasoning for embedding user-centered design research methods in the curriculum, describes the potential of these methods to transform learning and, as a result, better prepare graduates for their future career. Project-based learning was employed to explore the potential impact of embedding user-centered design research methods in the curriculum. Two project-based case studies, conducted with undergraduate design and design and marketing students in separate UK universities, illustrate how user-centered design research methods have been applied across traditional discipline boundaries. We report on student experiences immediately, and longitudinally (12 months) after the completion of the projects. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with students on completion of the projects revealed that a more holistic understanding of the design process was developed through the use of user-insights generated as a result of engagement with these methods. While this process had caused positive tensions and recognition of the need to move beyond the self and to put themselves in other people’s shoes, the insights generated informed subsequent design activity and provided a clearer link between research and design development. After 12 months, thematic analysis of follow-up interviews revealed changes in design practices through adoption of structured user-centered methods had led to an enhanced appreciation of contextual factors and underpinned and better justified design decisions. Detailed analysis of the findings informed the development of a Transforming Learning Framework which articulates how the adoption of user-centered design research methods shapes students longer-term understanding of, and approaches to, design. This framework conveys how new frames of reference and critical reflection led to an enhanced design skillset and mindset and as such provides new insights that have the potential to advance understandings of pedagogic practice. Finally, the research revealed that exposure to user-centered design research methods enhanced sensitivity to, and awareness of, user needs; increased understanding of context and the breadth of issues relevant in early stages of the design process; and amplified students confidence helping better prepare them for professional practice.
User-centered Research Methods, Transformative Learning Framework, Project-based Learning, Design Practice, Design Pedagogy
To cite this article
Jon Spruce, Martyn Evans, Transforming Learning Through User-Centered Design Research Methods, American Journal of Art and Design. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2020, pp. 50-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajad.20200502.15
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Redström, J (2020). Certain Uncertainties and the Design of Design Education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 83-100.
Innovate UK. (2016). Design in Innovation: Early stage interventions. Available at: https://admin.ktn-uk.co.uk/app/uploads/2017/01/DesignBook_FINAL_web-version.pdf. Accessed: 11 April 2020.
Maeda, J. (2018). Design in Tech Report 2018. Available at: https://designintech.report/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/dit2018as_pdf.pdf. Accessed: 15 May 2020.
Design Council. (2010). Multi-disciplinary design education in the UK: Report and recommendations from the Multi-Disciplinary Design Network. Available at: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/multi-disciplinary-design-education.pdf. Accessed: 11 April 2020.
Drew, C. (2019). What is a multidisciplinary approach to design? Available at: https://blog.wearefuturegov.com/what-is-a-multidisciplinary-approach-to-design-b5f62a28b804. Accessed: 12 April 2020.
Design Council. (2019). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council's evolved Double Diamond. Available at: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond. Accessed: 15 September 2019.
Melles, G., Anderson, N., Barrett, T., and Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2015). “Problem Finding through Design Thinking Education.” In Blessinger, P. (Ed.) Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. Emerald Group Publishing.
Weiss, L. (2002). Developing Tangible Strategies. Design Management Journal. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 33–38.
Kelley, D., and Kelley, T. (2015). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential within Us All. Harper Collins.
Marsh, S. (2018). User Research: A Practical Guide to Designing Better Products and Services. London: Koogan Page.
Fleischmann, K. (2008). Overcoming disciplinary boundaries in undergraduate design education: Preparing digital media design students for collaborative multidisciplinary research practice. ACUADS Conference, Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools. Adelaide, Australia.
Swanson, G. (2020). Educating the Designer of 2025. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 101-105,
Norman, D. (2010). Why Design Education Must Change. Available at: https://www.core77.com/posts/17993/why-design-education-must-change-17993. Accessed: 17 December 2017.
Laakso, M., & Clavert, M. (2014) Promoting creativity and design thinking skills among university students. Finland: Aalto University Design Factory. pp. 215-228.
Meyer, M., and Norman, D (2020). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 13-49.
Cox, G. (2005). Cox Review of Creativity in Business: Building on the UK's Strengths. London, UK: HM Treasury.
Pryce, V., and Whitaker, J. (2011). Restarting Britain: Design Education and Growth. London, UK: Design Commission.
Design Skills Advisory Panel. (2007). High-Level Skills for Higher Value. London, UK: Design Skills Advisory Panel.
IDEO. (2015). Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. Available at: https://www.ideo.com/post/design-kit. Accessed: 07 March 2020.
Wormald, P. (2011). Positioning industrial design students to operate at the 'fuzzy front end': Investigating a new arena of university design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 21. pp. 425-447.
Celikoglu, O., Krippendorff, K., and Ogut, S. (2020). Inviting Ethnographic Conversations to Inspire Design: Towards a Design Research Method. The Design Journal, 23:1, 133-152.
Payne, A. (2016). “Participatory Design.” In Edwards, C. (Ed.) The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Design. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 36-37.
Milton, A., & Rodgers, P. (2013). Research Methods for Product Design. London, UK: Laurence King.
Charlesworth, E. (2018). Walking The Talk: From theory to practice in delivering community based design education. The International Journal of Art & Design Education. Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 253-264.
Sanders, E. (2002). “From user-centered to participatory design approaches.” In: Frascara, J. (Ed.) Design and the Social Sciences. USA: Taylor & Francis.
Fuad-Luke, A. (2009). Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. Abingdon, Ox: Routledge.
Berger, J. (2004). Dancing on the Threshold of Meaning. Journal of Transformative Education. Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 336-351.
Meyer, J., and Land, R. (2003). “Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practicing.” In: Rust, C. (Ed.), Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD), pp 412-424.
Ericson, Å., Bergström, M., Larsson, A., and Törlind, P. (2009). Design Thinking Challenges in Education. Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 10, Design Education and Lifelong Learning. Palo Alto, CA, USA: The Design Society.
Krajcik, J., and Blumenfeld, P. (2006). “Project-Based Learning.” In: Keith Sawyer, R. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. (2006). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sara, R. (2011). Learning from Life – Exploring the Potential of Live Projects in Higher Education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, pp. 8-25.
Vega, V. (2015) Project-Based Learning Research Review. Available at: https://www.edutopia.org/pbl-research-learning-outcomes. Accessed: 01 April 2020.
Barron., B. and Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. USA: George Lucas Educational Foundation.
Thomas, J. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist. Vol. 26, No. 3-4, pp. 369-398.
Cranton, P. (1996). Professional Development as Transformative Learning: New Perspectives for Teachers of Adults. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Taylor, E. (1998). Transformative Learning: A critical review. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, & Vocational Education (Information Series No. 374), 80 pages.
Mezirow, Jack. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1997) Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education. No. 74, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Browse journals by subject